One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing .
Do you think advantageous of this Development outweigh the disadvantageous ?
It is undeniable that advancement in medical implements and treatment have brought many benefits for humanity. While there are a few drawbacks which have appeared with this development, I would argue that these are outweigh by the advantageous.
On the one hand, there are some disadvantages of improvement in medical science which consequently lead mankind to qualified life. The most dominant result is that progressing in medical cause a number of mortality has decreased tremendously. Therefore the population has increased accordingly. In addition most of the diseases can be diagnosed or cared. Hence, the age of humans and the population have increased.
Despite the above argument, the medical science has offered various possibilities for preventing of increasing in population and controlling the mankind crowd. for instance scientists have invented many tablets or other preventing implements for unwanted pregnancy. Not only has progressing in medical controlled population, but also with sophisticated device can detect the cause of many diseases and give the chance to humanity for preventing instead of treating. Thereby the life qualification and expectancy have increased remarkably in recent decades. Beside many remedy possibilities which have been accessible for a great deal of people , this improvement has facilitated the disabled people’s life with innovating artificial parts of bodies which can be similar human body sensitive and incredibly practical.
In conclusion, I believe that the advantageous of medical devices advancement are greater than drawbacks
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...velopment, I would argue that these are outweigh by the advantageous. On the one hand,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mortality seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much mortality', 'a good deal of mortality'.
Suggestion: much mortality; a good deal of mortality
...lt is that progressing in medical cause a number of mortality has decreased tremendously. Therefore t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...f mortality has decreased tremendously. Therefore the population has increased accordingl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...opulation has increased accordingly. In addition most of the diseases can be diagnosed o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted pregnancy. Not only has progressing in medical controlled population, but al...
^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...en accessible for a great deal of people , this improvement has facilitated the di...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...elieve that the advantageous of medical devices advancement are greater than drawbacks ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82905982906 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23289453308 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2343878095 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.923076923 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187996735036 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655447052541 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063550066484 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108776111852 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343468599926 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.