One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing .
Do you think advantageous of this Development outweigh the disadvantageous ?
It is undeniable that advancement in medical implements and treatment have brought many benefits for humanity. While there are a few drawbacks which have appeared with this development, I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantageous.
On the one hand, there are some disadvantages of improvement in medical science which consequently lead mankind to qualified life. The most dominant result is that progressing in medical cause a rate of mortality has decreased tremendously. Therefore,the population has increased accordingly. In addition, most of the diseases can be diagnosed or cared. Hence, the age of humans and the population have increased.
Despite the above argument, the medical science has offered various possibilities for preventing of increasing in population and controlling the mankind crowd. for instance, scientists have invented many tablets or other preventing implements for unwanted pregnancy. Not only, has progressing in medical controlled population, but also with sophisticated devices can detect the cause of many diseases and give the chance to humanity for preventing instead of treating. Thereby the life qualification and expectancy have increased remarkably in recent decades. Beside many remedy possibilities which have been accessible for a great deal of people, this improvement has facilitated the disabled people’s life with innovating artificial parts of bodies which can be similar human body sensitive and incredibly practical and efficient
In conclusion, progressive alterations in health cares are considered to crate various facilities for making human‘s life more graceful and pleasant. I personally believed that the merits of healthcare improvement outweigh the demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ty has decreased tremendously. Therefore,the population has increased accordingly. I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 838, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and incredibly practical and efficient In conclusion, progressive alterations i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92490118577 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26975672408 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.7483758572 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185516346164 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655388226815 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063767445547 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110627090184 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309500291783 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.