The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment.
What are the causes of this?
What can be done to solve this problem?
In this day and age, environment is endangered due to the consumption economy that deprives from overusing natural resources and lacking of wastes handling. Because of that, many effective solutions should be taken into consideration.
To begin with, the more the demands for commodities rise, the less natural resources available. More specifically, deforestations are increasing because of the firms and companies’ needs for materials. According to one survey of University of Toronto, Canada, the number of deforestations is higher three times in 2021 due to firms and companies’ supplies of woods, farming, and construction of buildings. In addition, the extrade market releases the largest CO2 amount which create greenhouse effect wastes from factories or oil from ships release into environment without handling day by day affect the ozon layer. For instance, in Viet Nam in 2018, one oil-delivery ship that killed oversea animals’ habitats and influenced residents’ life as well as jobs.
There are two main measures to improve the severe issue. First, government must involve in and limited the regulations as well as strengthen the criminal behaviors. After the intervention of government, goods consumption industry will brainstorm other ways to find raw materials that are environmentally-friendly. Second, although restriction has been published, there are some groups will betray or continue do illegal things. So that educations are regarded as the smart way and easier to approach citizens, specially children and teenager. Banners or slogans of using eco-friendly merchandises should be placed at the center of many big cities.
In conclusion, there are two mains reasons like the consumption industry and old-fashioned wastes’ handling which make the situation more serious that measures should be debated to end this issue as above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64412811388 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25570460376 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0215430436 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919733012081 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268171086328 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333925230991 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623699314167 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375757064756 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.