With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world must be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree.
The best way to meet the rise in requirement for fuels like oil and gas globally is considered to be accessing resource-abundant areas which are yet to be discovered. In my opinion, I agree that resource-rich areas should be opened up to supply fuels. However, I also believe that more investment should be done to create new renewable sources of energy.
To begin with, Fuels are very important for every country in the world in the present situation. To supply the unlimited demand it is very important to find new sources of energy. Hence, areas that are rich in these resources should be opened up for production. This is very useful for the country. By providing resources, the country gets global recognition and its economical situation improves a lot. Dubai a very rich country, is a prime example whose major portion of the money comes from exporting fuel. Another advantage is that investments in the country will increase. The only risk is the surge in pollution which may affect the natural habitat and disrupt the ecological balance.
Although we rely much on fossil fuels, it is important to note that these resources are limited and we might face a resource crisis in the future if proper steps are not taken. Companies should invest in research to find new sources of energy which are less harmful to the environment. Also, new initiatives should be taken by the countries to decrease the usage of non-renewable fuels and use renewable resources like Solar energy and wind energy. This cannot be implemented suddenly but in the long term, it might prove to be helpful.
In conclusion, new sources for fuels should be found all over the world but this should be a short term goal. Whereas, finding new sources to produce energy should be the long term goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...country gets global recognition and its economical situation improves a lot. Dubai a very ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d but this should be a short term goal. Whereas, finding new sources to produce energy ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87171052632 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68671677371 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536184210526 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1733227 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1176470588 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164168950132 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556675068035 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587667720949 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110287850639 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721670888699 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.