An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors, and there is no longer a sense of community. What do you think are the causes of this situation? Can you suggest some solutions?
It is a common phenomenon for many people feel unfamiliar with their neighbors. Some people believe if this matter become worse, people will no longer need community. Apart from the reasons of personal character, some other factors will also cause this result.
The most important reason is that people spend less time together than in the past. Many people just have nodding acquaintance with their neighbors because they can only meet each other when they go out. At the same time, changes in the structure of houses make it more difficult for people to meet each other. In the past, the house is open and usually has a yard so that neighbors could sit in the yard and chat with host. However nowadays less community provide such a yard for its residents to rest. Moreover, a fast-paced life makes people have no time to communicate with their neighbors. Fierce competition at work makes people less energetic to communicate with others, therefore they become more and more indifferent.
It is difficult to solve this problem. First and foremost, the community can provide more public area for people to rest and talk, such as recreation room or gyms. People will have more possibility to meet their neighbors when stay in these public area. Also, the community could hold more activities which invite their residences to participate. It obviously can create a platform for people become familiar with each other.
Overall, communities should reflect their functions through management and developing activities. A community with well organize and secure environment can help its residences expand their social bond.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...uld sit in the yard and chat with host. However nowadays less community provide such a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18939393939 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56884098093 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1339442276 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5882352941 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158196099747 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591336828589 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505564503822 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11324839238 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652664286345 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.