With the increasing popularity of computers and calculators, student literacy is decreasing dramatically. What are the positive and negative effects the progress of science and technology has brought about?
Development science and technology, such as computers and calculators, have affected many people from over 50 years ago. Both are bringing some benefits and drawbacks to the student literacy until now. Amongst of the result from these devices will be examined in this essay.
To begin with, student literacy is related to an ability from student to understand student comprehension of incoming information through reading some media resources, and listening to a radio instead watching a news television program. Most of the tools, which should help to improve student ability, are even shut down students’ cognition to truly grasp the incoming information through various kind media resources. All of the ease media in access already brought some shortcoming effects to student itself, which first and foremost are student creativity. For instance, they are being lazy to read some resources whose have a long story as well as to listen to a serious news TV program. By reading and listening, the creativity of student actually could improve significantly. Secondly is procrastination, they sometimes oversimplify their work because of their think that there is enough time to finish it. Even, most of them are only copy and paste the information from the internet.
Of the many shortcomings student literacy, however, there are some benefits to affect student ability to read and to listen comprehensively. By using the sophisticated appliances could make them fast to learn about something and increasing their productivity. The devices are able to help them as training tools to enlarge their student literacy. Using technology of computer, for example, they can easily check their understanding of reading article instead of their writing, or the calculator helping them to correct their calculation. In order to increase their understanding about literacy, teachers are primarily responsible from the issue of student literacy. The teachers should think deeply how they improve student literacy with collaboration between the way-their-teach and sophisticated technologies – computer, calculator, and the other devices.
To sum up, the development of science and technology are bringing positive and negative side equally. In specific to this issue, I believe that the advantages of using computer and calculator are more beneficial to the student to gain their ability in literacy. Yet, that depends on student itself and assistance from their teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...n through various kind media resources. All of the ease media in access already brought so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'shortcomings'' or 'shortcoming's'?
Suggestion: shortcomings'; shortcoming's
...ation from the internet. Of the many shortcomings student literacy, however, there are so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54089709763 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.033125848 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532981530343 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7784620758 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.526315789 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205788406288 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651763204969 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493310929145 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128090360634 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197118799801 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.