Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Pollution problems and growing traffic are problems of controversy. In recent years, governors in all over the world, seek to solution which can reduce the impact of them. Both together would cause myriad problems dependent on the region. Some people believe that increasing petrol price would lead to lower using of petrol-driven cars which can reduce growing traffic and pollution problems while other acclaims that it has a slight effect on them since rich people can still use the personal cars.
First and foremost, thing is that Increasing the price of petrol demand certain infrastructures by the government which last for long period of time. These affect people earning directly. Since increasing price of petrol is proportion by increasing the salaries, it has imperceptible effect on using cars. Also, it should be noted that using biofuel cars are in progress which decreases effect of price of petrol to traffic jam.
Pollution has many reasons such as industrial activities, thunderstorm, burning farm field and illegal activities which play an important role in polluting the air. For instance, many industries and companies are in the city and their fumes discharge their by-products in the air. They contain variety of toxin composition which can react by other components in the air and make pollution even worse.
To wrap it up, I strongly believe for solving growing traffic and pollution problem, the government must take initiative to use another solution. By updating public transport, people use fewer private cars. Along with this, monitoring industrial activities and place the industries in the suburb can reduce contamination in a good way. Informing people about possible sources of pollution can avoid many problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s by the government which last for long period of time. These affect people earning directly. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, still, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36231884058 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74650108701 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3583379755 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213753935141 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699268718603 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633609135501 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127125784145 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047965728562 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.