Increasing the price of petrol is the solution to the traffic and air pollution problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Issues of congestion and pollution in cities have been widely discussed.Accroding to some, imposing higher tariffs on fossil fuel is the most effective solution to the problem of traffic and air pollution. In my opinion, I completely agree to this argument as an increase in the price of petrol will cut the demand for petrol; moreover, the government will generate enough revenue to support other useful interventions.
Petrol, which is for both domestic and industrial purposes, is highly responsive to price changes. Therefore, if the managers, who have the statutory authority over the cost of fuel, impose higher taxes on the commodity, there will be a multiplier effect on the number of auto-mobiles that ply city roads, thus, the number will overwhelmingly cut as most citizens will opt for other affordable means of transport, such as car-pooling and public transport. Consequently, the amount of toxic chemicals emitted from vehicles will drastically reduce, as well as free flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
In furtherance, the revenue accumulated by policy makers from such a move will help other essential areas with respect to easing traffic and improving the environment. To further explain, governments can invest the financial gains in transport infrastructural expansion, such as underground roads and lanes, over-ground interchanges and modern bridges, which help motorists to navigate effortlessly. In addition, another real angle is public education. In other words, the citizenry need education on the need to use environmentally friendly means of transport, such as car-pooling, walking, cycling and public transport for the day-to-day activities. This cannot be done without financial resources; hence, the state can make good use of the extra revenue in such venture.
In conclusion, the congestion and air pollution in major cities and towns cannot be denied; nonetheless, I strongly agree that adjusting the cost of petroleum higher is the best way to tackle this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Accroding
...on in cities have been widely discussed.Accroding to some, imposing higher tariffs on fos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51290322581 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16083768978 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2794991034 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.363636364 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4545454545 7.06120827912 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143792460036 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544810943945 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631038866145 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10828197121 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893478106331 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.