In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
The relation between gender and their subjects of study has been widely discussed. Globally, it is not uncommon for females to read humanities whereas their counterparts study science based courses. This essay discusses the course structure and future professional competence as the catalysts for this development. In my opinion, it is needless to reverse this phenomenon as students have the freedom to choose their respective courses of study; moreover, this trend motivates the younger generation.
Undeniably, there is gender segregation in the educational front, secondary and tertiary levels alike. Firstly, the structural composition of the courses is a principal reason behind this. To further explain, science subjects are known for abstract and critical thinking. As such, boys, who are genetically endowed with these abilities, naturally gravitate to these courses, such as chemistry and physics. Girls, on the other hand are naturally meek and inclined to non-abstract situation; hence they automatically have affection for arts and social subjects, seemingly correlate with their make-up. Additionally, it is practically true that while women excel in areas of social care, men display competence in technological fields; so, students are motivated to select study areas that will guarantee their future professional excellence.
In my view, there is no practical merit in altering this development. To begin with, ones choice of study is a fundamental human right as study courses have bearing on capabilities as well as future goals. Therefore, any act of reversing this phenomenon will not only amount to infringing upon their basic rights, but also fading their talents and future aspirations.
In furtherance, the young ones imitate the foot-steps of the older generation who have distinguished themselves on their respective fields. This form of motivation has a positive correlation with gender roles; hence this trend must ensue.
In conclusion, the pattern of choice with respect to gender and studies cannot be denied as this is heavily influenced by the make-up of the courses and future roles. In my view, it is needful for this trend to continue to protect rights and motivate students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tering this development. To begin with, ones choice of study is a fundamental human ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53823529412 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95704396256 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579411764706 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.509495568 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.764705882 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8235294118 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152105285146 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552515764711 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487620171276 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947273360348 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310746935708 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.