In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Globally, the rate at which citizens suffer from diet-related ailments appears unprecedented. It is argued that the state must impose higher levies on fast foods. I completely agree with this assertion, as this will reduce diet-induced diseases and then raise money for the nation.
Poor dieting, like any social challenge, requires an evident-based intervention from policy makers. As such, imposing higher taxes on junk foods seems right. Demand for items such as food his highly sensitive to price; hence, many will be discouraged from purchasing these foods, which have devastating effects on their wellness. For instance, in Ecuador, the heavy tax on sugar-based foods has drastically reduced the rate of diabetes in the state. Given the high cost of these foods, citizens will be indirectly compelled to eat healthy food products. Consequently, the health status of residents will be improved - a major social merit.
In furtherance, the revenue raised from such exercise will allow the government to undertake some positive measures. Firstly, given the extra revenue from the high taxes on processed foods, the government can invest in public education on the need for healthy eating, as well as the adverse consequences of fast foods. This can be achieved through a collaborative effort with stakeholders, such as doctors and nurses. Public health education has been exemplified in the U.K, which has a positive impact on the residents. Secondary, another real avenue is the investment in diversified organic food products. Eventually, the focus of the citizens will shift from poor diet to organic foods, which seem healthier.
In conclusion, the rising trend of eating-relating diseases cannot be denied. It is needful for state managers to impose higher tariffs on packaged foods. This measure will not only prevent ailments, but also provide financial capital for investments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should write at least 250 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the solution to the traffic and air pollution problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 89
- Each year, the crime rate increases.What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch exercise will allow the government to undertake some positive measures. Firstl...
^^
Line 6, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...education has been exemplified in the U.K, which has a positive impact on the res...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46598639456 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89967060705 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605442176871 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7000659412 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21236540246 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682849787449 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383029546076 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130580088416 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255207857226 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.