Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.
The recent condition of the environment is gradually degrading with overpopulation and unwanted pollution. The prompt recommends that individuals cannot solve the problem of global issues rather it is the sole responsibility of the government and large companies to make a beneficial change. However, in my opinion, I am conditional with the claim and argue that all of us together can fight for the problem. Government should take a lead and individuals and bigger companies should follow them.
Firstly, government plays a crucial role to improve the condition of the earth by implementing a number of rules and regulations like imposing a green tax on industries and individuals and managing waste products. For instance, to fight global warming the government of Norway has started a campaign with a slogan of, “no purchase of diesel and petrol-powered vehicles”. Giving more priority to electric vehicles, it has begun the campaign. Thus, it will surely have a beneficial impact by reducing carbon emission and thereby improving the ozone layer.
Moreover, giant industries are responsible for the emission of pollution and waste products. Developing green industry strategies, utilizing waste, recycling used products, and complying with the rules placed by the nation can help to make the world a better place to live in.
Furthermore, common individuals can also play a minor role in improving our surroundings. Even though the public may not have a major role to mitigate pollution as industries and government do, they can certainly help the campaign merely by planting trees and managing household waste products. Increasing awareness among the citizen and instilling the hazard of a declining environment can additionally help people to be responsible.
In conclusion, though the supreme politicians and enormous industries can play a significant role in dealing with climate change, individuals can also play an imperative role by recycling solid waste, garbage and organizing tree plantation program. Hence, government as a leader and companies and people as a follower can ameliorate the critical situation of the earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50151057402 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10638372492 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.296335117 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194275323046 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643493773136 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297665805802 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106680145708 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351146080443 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.