Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that due to the advent of modern technology- ebooks and internet, it will totally supplant newspaper and magazines in the future. However, in my opinion, I disagree with the prompt and argue that it will not totally replace the newspaper and magazine but only partially by citing two reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, Even though the internet and ebooks are almost ubiquitous around the world, that does not mean everyone has to use them for reading newspapers or magazines. For instance, the higher-level politicians of Nepal are above the middle-class standard. They all possess sophisticated internet facilities and gadgets, but they still favor a printed form of articles or newspapers. It is, thus, important that ebooks and modern technology will not totally replace the newspaper and magazines.
In addition, there is still some part of the world that do not have facilities of internet and electronics gadgets that result in newspaper and magazines as only the medium that people acquire information. For example, most of the parts of Nepal are out of internet service and people in those areas have not been familiar with the mediums like ebooks and mobiles. Due to these circumstances, newspaper publications are burgeoning still in the present context. Hence, from the above evidence, it can be contended that newspapers and magazines are not going to be replaced.
In conclusion, the issue of whether that Ebooks and modern technology will entirely take the place of traditional newspapers and magazines is complex. Some people suggested that the rapid advent of technology can replace ordinary means of information like newspapers and magazines. I, nevertheless, contend that newspapers will not be entirely replaced with ebooks and other extraordinary devices because even though having those mediums, most people still favor newspapers and some parts of the world still do not have facilities of the internet and those devices.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, nevertheless, so, still, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31210191083 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84585103409 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477707006369 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9449174637 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.307692308 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377049318534 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150009505003 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121586466942 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255053607938 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102358912211 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.