Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace eg at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadiantage

Digital technology provides opportunities to do a job in each place out of the office, for instance, at home, in a car, in a restaurant, etc. There are some benefits and drawbacks to working from a long distance.
On the one hand, new telecommunication equipment develops or expands the embodiment of an individual, which means that an employee could be available, virtually, in his workspace while his physical body is in another place. For instance, you can take care of your infant, who is sleep, while you are trying to organize next week meetings of your boss. In another word, telepresence would assist you to have two different types of being, simultaneously. Obviously, it is beneficial for most of the people in the modern era, as they confront a shortage in the time, many times during their life.
On the other hand, although using the internet helps us to work remotely some people believe that it would reduce the quality of any work in the long-term. Furthermore, humankind brain is not able to match features with this new way of living. Thus, in a short time, it would be inevitable to feel anxiety or depression.
In my opinion, people should try new technologies as they reveal. So, I believe, we have to utilize provided opportunities, to work with them, in the age of technology. However, people need to take time to be compatible with each forthcoming situation.
To sum up, working from ling distance becomes a trend in the near future as it has numerous advantages. Everyone should try to play his role in the best way to adopt himself while he is aware of the problems related to this mobility.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...ing situation. To sum up, working from ling distance becomes a trend in the near fu...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77580071174 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89130522449 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7879659123 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148245854105 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450504758587 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461548368594 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808012238353 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560215305026 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.