In the current time of technological advancements; one of the most pressing concerns regarding the given topic asserts that whether international community should bring awareness among the world about the problem of over consumption of fossil fuels or not? I am completely agree with the statement and shall explore the dimensions and assertions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end.
To begin with, fossil fuels are contributing to excessive carbondioxide in the atmosphere, due to which global warming is increasing. People are unconscious about the environment and make use of it above from the limit. Therefore, all the countries should come up and delibrate carefully that how to deter the amount of fossil fuels which are in use on the daily basis. For instance, there are millions of transport throughout the world, every vehicle run on the oil, used in enginees, which emit harmful gases and leads to environmental destruction.
Apart from that, fossil fuels are the non renewable sources, once it depleted, it will never come again as it took millions of year to produce. Moreover, scientists do not even have an alternative source of fossil fuels. Therefore, every nation should make its people aware of the importance of it and suggest harmful hazards of it for the environment. For example, government of every nation can conduct surveys so that people come to know about the various measures for saving fossil fuels.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that international community definitely gathered the entire world to curb this inevitable matter, otherwise, one day will come, when fossil fuels would completely eradicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...of fossil fuels or not? I am completely agree with the statement and shall explore th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'eradicate'
Suggestion: eradicate
...ome, when fossil fuels would completely eradicated.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25468164794 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89522072045 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6505501825 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166062984393 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580322303638 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343429253197 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962958498852 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00912584279614 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.