INTERNATIONAL SPORTS EVENTS
Recently the phenomenon has been brought into focus is that many international sport events are held in many nations. Some people think this is a good chance for the host country, whereas the others do not think so. In my standpoint, to hold international sport events might bring out both pros and cons. In the following essay, I would like to examine both sides of the coin.
On the one hand, there is no denying that hosting an international event could bring the host country honor and prestige as it becomes the center of attention globally. As a result, the country itself is assured of a persistent increase in recognition and tourism. For example, Beijing, the capital of China became more popular after hosting 2008 Summer Olympic. Moreover, the events also support the local economy with a huge income from tickets and telecast rights. Besides, being the host of an international event could improve the number of employment opportunities for the native and promotes the local tourism.
On the other hand, one thing that is of significance is that the host country has to use a large government budget which could be utilized somewhere else to hold the event. The local government has to pay the fee to improve the facilities and security for the host city, which could be a burden for many developing countries. The closest example is Greece, which has fallen into a huge international debt after hosting an Olympic. Furthermore, in the contrast of fame when hosting a international event, the country might face the negative publicity if thing went wrong.
In conclusion, the cons of holding international sport events are outweighed by its pros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e, in the contrast of fame when hosting a international event, the country might ...
^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port events are outweighed by its pros.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96415770609 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75319215816 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.305929542 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362199524171 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139880141935 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147295351355 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279653271493 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121537611078 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.