The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise.To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?

As technology have been developing our lives are getting easier. We could manage time and work via the Internet more efficiently. However, our personal relationships could be damaged if our perceptions and preferences substitutive from real friendship to virtual friendship.
What do I mean by the virtual relationship? I will explain that word by giving example from my life. I used to have a Facebook account and I had 1000 friends. Majority of these people were not my best friends of course. I met them at the party, library, school or they are friends of my other friends. Actually, they are just acquaintances. Facebook enables only to keep in touch with people and these friendships are so superficial and virtual. Connecting people is a good thing, of course, I am not underestimating this, but I would prefer real, face to face relationship. Whenever I come together with my friends, I always stop playing phone, because they are precious to me so they are worth it. However, my 'dear' friends do not bother to look at my face while we were talking. This feeling hurts me but I have nothing to do. That is why I agree the Internet isolates us and encourages people not to socialise.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As technology have been developing our liv...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, so, while, i mean, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78155339806 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93644383949 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635922330097 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7520952939 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.6666666667 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7333333333 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165870884843 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057437366945 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810018105182 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102099571582 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760695759247 0.056905535591 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.