Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The advent of the Internet has facilitated different aspects of life. While many people believe that this technology can help them understand how experiences in other countries are, I support the idea that traveling is better to discover others' ways of life.
On the one hand, Internet connections can allow users to be cognizant of life in foreign nations. In fact, Internet users can gain access to an unlimited repository, including a great deal of information about cultures, traditions worldwide. Thus, people can grasp the theoretical knowledge of a specific country. Furthermore, the Internet can empower more potent technologies, which can provide more visually authentic experiences and encourage more engagement in simulated contexts. As an example, people in Vietnam can admire peach blossoms in Japan with a virtual reality headset pair. Therefore, the Internet can provide users with information and visual experiences about other countries.
On the other hand, traveling overseas can offer physical experiences. Visiting places beyond the border can allow travelers to immerse themselves in interacting with indigenous communities, which can help them most understand local life. In addition, people can expose to numerous things in a destination that can not be found on the Internet, which are authentic food flavors and its weather. Moreover, real experiences can enrich people's intrinsic values, which are personal stories, open-mindedness, and memories rather than factual information available on the Internet. Therefore, nothing seems to be comparable with traveling due to the genuine experiences it can bring.
In conclusion, those who want to learn about other cultures can utilize the Internet. However, I believe that traveling can hold greater values and change people's mindset positively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69597069597 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9739619721 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2253427989 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147657320976 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623549741846 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448395521203 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119003571976 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533359459512 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.