It is argued that mobile phones and other electronic devices have no place in the classroom.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Recently, smartphones and other such handy gadgets have gained popularity all over the globe. Despite of the many benefits they provide, these devices can be a source of distraction for students in critics eyes. However, negative side of these gadgets can be easily ignored by considering the advantages they have brought. This essay is going to highlight some of these positive advantages which can be of great help for students.
Firstly, technological advancements have really made our life so much easier than it was before. Students can use smartphones to record lectures while listening to them at the same time. For example, in my case, it is bit hard for me to concentrate on lecture while preparing my notes in parallel. Therefore, I always prefer to use my smartphone to capture any important details which I may require in the future.
Extending the benefits of electronic gadgets, they might save you a lot of money. Including students, people from different professions are using electronic gadgets like smartphones and tablets as cheap substitute to conventional equipment. For example, students can download a free copy of textbook right into their smartphone which will save them a considerable amount of money and also hassle of carrying books to their classroom.
All things considered; one can easily argue that a productive use of electronic gadgets within classroom can be very beneficial for students. Since advantages associated with these devices worth much more than their drawbacks, therefore banning them all together is not a logical thing to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...me time. For example, in my case, it is bit hard for me to concentrate on lecture w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24505928854 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87724774364 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5827038561 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102424443694 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371657025748 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292586920877 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638372026339 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035340977976 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.