It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Educating young people’s ability to notice right and wrong has played a crucial role for them to become good citizens, especially when they were juveniles. And some people believe that enforcing sanctions on them is the best way to nurturing them. Personally, I strongly disagree with this notion.
There are numerous explanations that contradict the above-mentioned theory. Firstly, harsh punishment can bring negative consequences for juveniles that parents are unable to notice. This will impair children’s damage the physical, and especially mental health. A kid who suffered these penalties tend to have a mental disorder in the future. Furthermore, children might lead themselves further to the incorrect way, which eventually can become a criminal. Secondly, when adults abuse children, that means they are violating the children protection laws. And going to prison is the final penalty for those parents.
Therefore, if sanctions for bad children is a must, then physical abuses or harsh punishments is not allowed. Instead, there are many light penalties that parents and teachers can apply to educate juveniles. Cutting down their daily money, or game time are the appropriate ways to discipline a child. Another effective approach is letting the kid to take the responsibility for their works and adjust their works since they have times to judge their acts carefully and realize why they are being punished. By having these experiences, children can learn the lessons faster and more efficiently.
In conclusion, punishment should not be required to teach children because it can create significant drawbacks. They can be replaced by lighter but more effective penalties to help them learn the right things to do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42962962963 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83940525854 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640740740741 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7155519929 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2352941176 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198446169504 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611988502487 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048271566685 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124155116712 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335976167966 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.