It is true that teaching young children to tell right from wrong makes a great difference in their growth. I agree that punishing children when they do wrong allows them to distinguish right and wrong efficiently but it is subject to proper punishment methods.
For a variety of reasons, a proper punishment can help children learn and improve from what they have done. To start with, compared with rewards, punishment provides an undesirable experience for young people, thus making it possible for them to be aware that they have done something wrong. In addition, paying one's debts is reasonable. When children have to pay a cost for their behaviour, they would like to think twice before performing it directly, which helps them make fewer mistakes. What's more, if there is no punishment, children could not realize dangers of wrong things and the joys from the right things would be at a discount.
Therefore, many proper punishment methods should be taken by parents and teachers to help children learn the distinction of between right and wrong. Punishment performs as a method of education, which cannot threaten young people's mental and physical health. For example, punishing bad behaved children by not allowing them to watch TV or play their favourite toys can help children realize their mistakes and do nothing bad to their health at the same time. Besides, teachers and parents could allow some study or housework tasks to be children's educational punishment. These can help those who behave badly pay for their behaviour and improve their other skills.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that proper punishment is sometimes necessary to teach children to behave well and tell right and wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ne something wrong. In addition, paying ones debts is reasonable. When children have...
^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
..., which helps them make fewer mistakes. Whats more, if there is no punishment, childr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57234003445 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1203574481 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344569970338 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12953603306 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881536413582 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222003882716 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158832355398 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.