It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Teaching history to students plays a part in the transition of human knowledge from the previous generations to the future ones. With the world in such emphasis on globalization, many of us face an identity crisis which consequently leads us to look back on our origins. Personally, I believe that learning about regional history is more significant than global history.
Firstly, we must consider the potential negative aspects of taking local history for granted. For example, if a Kurdish student coming from Turkey is not aware of his past, culture, and ancestors, how can he define himself in the country discriminates between him and others and how would he maintain a balance between being a Kurd and a Turk. As a result, it is essential for many young individuals to learn about their local and ethnic history in an attempt to be able to address such identity conflicts. Furthermore, apart from that local history can make a considerable contribution to shaping our identities, it can create a strong sense of belonging to a community. This is because students are likely to be able to reach shared experiences and establish partnerships with their local community which leads to a more stable and unified society.
Admittedly, it is correct that learning global history could increase cross-cultural awareness and understanding, making people from the world over close and peaceful to each other. Nevertheless, this notion is significantly neglected when people from different backgrounds do not respect the differences that exist between them.
To summarize, I believe that prior to world history, local history should be incorporated as a part of the history curriculum for pupils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, apart from, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02783189815 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595588235294 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9018175352 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248606946085 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100120538884 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838533807936 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156181361758 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494091282558 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.