It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The teaching of history to students plays a part in the transition of human knowledge form older generations to future ones. With the world in such emphasis on globalization and coalesce, many of us face an identity crisis, consequently leading us to revert to our origin. Personally, I feel that learning about regional history is preferable to global history, and I will explain why.
Firstly, we must consider the potential negatives of taking local history for granted. For example, if a Kurdish student coming from Turkey is not aware of their past, cultures, and ancestors, how they would define themselves in the country discriminates against them and how they would maintain a balance between being a Kurdish and Turkish. As a result, it is essential for many young individuals to learn about their local and ethnic histories in an attempt to be able to address such identity conflicts. Furthermore, apart from that local history can make a considerable contribution to shaping who we are, it can create a solid sense of community. This is because students are likely to be able to reach shared experiences and build partnerships with the local community, leading to a more stable and unified society.
Admittedly, it is correct that learning global history could increase cross-cultural awareness and understanding, causing people from the world over to be close and peaceful to each other. Nevertheless, this aspiration suffers significantly when confronted with the dearth of respect to differences among people with different backgrounds.
To summarize, I believe that prior to world history, local history should be incorporated as a part of the history curriculum for pupils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, apart from, for example, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32592592593 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05042442346 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9897665612 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.727272727 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218727852801 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870744505459 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675732860355 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138041699205 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581528156772 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.