It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the youth are learning in an environment infrastructure investment by the government and this has negative implication to the nation. I completely disagree with this view.
It proves possible for a country to provide equipment to tertiary education for young people. The first reason is the quality of education. At most colleges or universities, except some practical discipline such as engineering, the procurement material serve the majority of study. Meanwhile improving the quality of education will narrow the gap with prestigious universities and attract more international students, who are not afraid to expensive tuition fees in order to enjoy a good quality of learning. It leads to the second reason in which I recognize authority should evolve in parallel with other priorities.
The support that is necessary for the university students is in line with the country's development path. Because that is the quality of future generations of workers. State and businesses will create more job opportunities, this will reduce the burden on society and sustainable economic development. Otherwise, distinguished graduates will attempt to match the tuition fees and effort spent. Even better, they will be trained for the position of the key by the policies of the state and business. There is the guarantee that the students will contribute to the well-being of their nation after finishing their education.
As a conclusion, I strongly believe that things young people receive from these investments from the government are prerequisite for long-term benefits the country
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...t material serve the majority of study. Meanwhile improving the quality of education will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ine with the countrys development path. Because that is the quality of future generatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48790322581 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08798052119 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9307003998 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161885790448 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555961625939 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997850509728 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086910807835 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429967729978 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.