It is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays, the technology has more advanced as compared to the earlier years so for that at now tourist lovers who ease to travel in remote natural area. I opine that there are many pros rather than few cons of this development.
On the one hand, in this era majority of people who really like to see the natural beauty because of that they willing to face any trouble in life and mad about it to pay the double investment for travelling. Firstly, people also prefer to go with family members so that they can make more memories and show off the public status among friends. Moreover, when tourist go there then they probably take part in games such as hiking, skating and so on, with after winning the sports they gain to money and fame. For instance, it is truth that in the 21st century man who has reached in the moon then for that reach on south pole it is not big task. Besides this, it is more beneficial especially for researchers owing to they collect the valuable data which environment's there day by day more damage than they also try to tackle of this problem to get rid the worst pollution.
On the other hand, I believe that it is just waste of money rather than that money use only welfare for community. Secondly, some natural areas like south pole and Amazon forests where more visitor come to every year and explore to more garbage which are directly bad impact on natural beauty.
In conclusion, I think that go to remote natural area has brought some disadvantages like more money invest on this project and also confront risk's life, however, this development bring to few advantages such as provide data about for precious animals and has got some herbs or plants which are really helpful in the medical field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...s life, however, this development bring to few advantages such as provide data abo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57556270096 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2573675541 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575562700965 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.639929036 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.3 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226715514147 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844083958262 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586857330511 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144099978473 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351998455666 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.