Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is universal truth that, the invention of the advanced technology has improved the lifestyle of people. While, majority of people who believe that e-books and modern gadgets will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines because thus we improve the reading skill and keep update in daily routine. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both point of view.
On the one hand, I would argue that the benefits of reading the newspaper and magazine. Firstly, now in this era some people who daily in the morning time like read the newspaper, especially the elder people because they think it is better way to improve the fluency and get a more chance to learn the different vocabulary. Moreover, in the 21st century educate people who more encourage to buy the magazine's favourite celebrity causing by they become are more fashionable and excited more collect to the valuable piece. For instance, in developed country like America and Canada where very affluent people lives, with they fascinate more to purchase the prior magazine which is famous across the world such as the science fiction and make in India.
On the other hand, there are numerous stunning drawbacks of reading more books and Pantheon daily routine. Secondly, most of the people who are hectic in office or study work for this reason they can be not carrier the newspaper everywhere than it is better way if they use technology for reading. Furthermore, private companies which are manufacturing a paper by cut down the trees, it is very concern issue for the government or society so for that authority must be to encourage the people that use more technology for reading. Thus, they safe more the environment and lives.
In conclusion, I opine apart from inventing the technhas more effective ways to read the newspaper and pamphlets everywhere and safe more the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a daily'.
Suggestion: who is a daily
...e. Firstly, now in this era some people who daily in the morning time like read the newsp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'buying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: buying
...ntury educate people who more encourage to buy the magazines favourite celebrity causi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99361022364 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57401336733 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7196947527 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162254255064 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059144673452 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697599862621 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101897330567 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683261191889 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.