The chart below the information that younger one faced the unemployment in five different countries in 2005.
The column chart illustrates the information about the proportion of how many youngster who had no anywork to do and conclude the ration of jobless younger in five different European countries in 2005.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that the number of younger people in Poland liked more to live without work but, in Denmark the proportion of young unemployed worker had showed at least as compared to other three countries Italy, Hungary and Germany.
To commence with, about 35% of unemployed youngster were unlike the work to do in daily routine, which was the most highest in 2005. While, in Hungary and Germany where the figure for younger 15 to 24 years olds jobless individual had showed to equally approximately under 20 in the same year. There was a younger who did not have work more in Italy at just below one quater. The percentage of youngster who were not work in Denmark which was accounting for 7% in 2005.
However, the ratio of overall unemployment rate in the age group of 15 to 24 years olds who had faced more problem to find the job in Poland and Germany at 15% and 10%, respectively. On the other hand, in both European countries in Italy and Hungary where the percentage of overall unemployment were represent to same nearby under 10 by younger generations. Finally, at around a small number of employment did not have in Denmark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun youngster seems to be countable; consider using: 'many youngsters'.
Suggestion: many youngsters
...information about the proportion of how many youngster who had no anywork to do and conclude t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...k to do in daily routine, which was the most highest in 2005. While, in Hungary and Germany ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'represented'.
Suggestion: represented
...percentage of overall unemployment were represent to same nearby under 10 by younger gene...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...younger generations. Finally, at around a small number of employment did not have in Denmark.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, while, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59617624163 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522633744856 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9925921353 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262845534022 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965174069557 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803039177193 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155752292989 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800225506637 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.