It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
The advance in science and technology resulted in the state-of-the-art exploration equipment, are now enabling scientists as well as tourists to satisfy their thirst for discovering the pristine and uninhibited environment. From my perspective, while the benefits of this advancement are undeniable, its adverse impacts on natural habitat should not be underestimated
On the one hand, there is a variety of justifications for supporting this development. One fundamental advantageous influence is that this may be the magic bullet to solve the problem of insufficient energy resources. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that discovering anonymous natural areas offers people an opportunity to detect new sort of energy that can be an ideal alternative for fossil fuels. Another benefit which is worth considering is that this enriches the general knowledge of human beings. There seems to be no doubt that analysing pristine regions is synonymous with a great deal of information can be accomplished, therefore, creates favourable conditions to research and investigate exotic fauna and flora as well as obscure lands and distinctive phenomena as well as be a culprit of several breakthroughs in the future
Nevertheless, discovering in some circumstance has catastrophic effects on the natural habitat of one particular area. This is particularly significant that human activities may disrupt the ecosystem as well as the flora and fauna living inside it. An illustration of this is that several ancient caves in the Northern nations are being exploited in an inappropriate way in order to serve tourism. Consequently, this not only eradicates the primitive beauty of these caves but also cause significant damage to the geographical structure, thereby, attributing to earthquakes and several relevant natural catastrophes. An illustration of this is that constructions, agriculture and recreational businesses might takeover wild animal’s land, thus toss a huge amount of waste and contamination to their food resources, causing their population to decrease to the verge of extinction
In conclusion, discovering remote areas may highly beneficial for enriching our knowledge as well as recommending a new solution to the shortage of energy. Nonetheless, numerous animals and plants may be forced into the edge of extinction as an outcome of this development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate way" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he Northern nations are being exploited in an inappropriate way in order to serve tourism. Consequently...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6295264624 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41813716407 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58217270195 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.796832154 49.4020404114 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 183.727272727 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6363636364 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2727272727 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149015678723 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592043588065 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301503956664 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955275221326 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241569067745 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.