It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.
What are causes ? And what will be effects on society ?
Over the past few years, we have seen an alarming decrease in the number of science students in universities and colleges. This trend happens due to some reasons as well as its adverse impacts on society.
There are two excuses why fewer university pupils are choosing science as their major. First of all, those subjects are usually difficult and challenging, which demands them to put outstanding effort and great intelligence into their study. The surveys show that the average biology students have to do many experiments and numerous projects with a higher level of complexness, which discourages them to select these subjects. Moreover, after graduation, job opportunities in this field of science are still more limited than other sectors. Hence, they have a trend towards choosing other subjects that let them find jobs less competitive.
The deficiency of leaners in science fields can bring some negative effects. The first impact is the imbalance in the future workforce. In contrast, a growing tendency for students choosing to study other subjects such as economics, business…etc, a number of science subjects are restricted. Therefore, the number of seniors with too with degrees of the same ability leads to unemployment due to the larger number of workers provided than social demands. Another problem is the lack of qualified types of equipment as well as low-skilled employees. Thus, it is necessary to solve this issue, so that society avoid facing human resource crisis.
In conclusion, some strict requirements and employment opportunities are one of the reasons why a lot of students not choosing science subjects to study, and this problem also brings some serious impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g human resource crisis. In conclusion, some strict requirements and employment ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8418873537 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1528488903 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131643775294 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411618396104 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385557540139 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767326011785 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167364934841 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.