It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a tendency for primary schools to encourage schoolchild to plant floras and breed faunas. From my perspective, the benefits of this trend tend to surpass the downsides in light of the following compelling reasons.
On the one hand, facilitating to grow vegetables and feeding animals might bring about a plethora of outstanding advantages to a schoolchild. To begin with, this encouragement might provide children with a precious opportunity to get access to a healthy and reliable source of food. Take Vietnam as a prime example, self-sufficient source of vegetables and meats stemming from the school-based farms is likely to help schoolchild to steer clear of food poisoning. Another advantage of this trend is to raise learners’ awareness of the vitality of environmental protection. This is because human activities these days have caused grave consequences to the environment, including flooding and landslides. As a result, should young learners are taught to grow plants and raise animals, this will nurture an array of nature lovers which hinders the environment from being severely polluted.
On the other hand, getting exposure to plantation and animals feeding could trigger several unanticipated problems to a schoolchild. First and foremost, it is undeniable that bacterias and infectious viruses from animals could put schoolchild’s health at high risks. This is because a schoolchild tends to downplay the importance of hygiene acknowledgement after feeding the animals, which, in turn, might facilitate viruses to penetrate their body and cause health-related problems such as respiratory problems. In tandem with this, insects from the soil once children grow plants might also affect learners’ health. This is because parasites from polluted soil might prolong their lives for hours on children’s hands, which, might lead to digestion-related diseases in children.
In conclusion, although the drawbacks of growing vegetables and animals feeding can not be overlooked, it is my firm conviction that the positive outcomes of this trend are inclined to far outweigh its negative effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59752321981 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18645194895 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600619195046 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4980329015 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141925746559 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511276135519 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457511408223 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873873191525 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401626350693 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.