In the last 20 years, tnhe assessment of students has undergone major transformation. Many educational institutions no longer use formal examinations as a means of assessment as they believe formal examination results are an unfair indication of a student’s ability.
The examination Process of pupils have faced pivotal shift in the past two decades. Some schools have changed their pedagogical phenomena regarding the assessment process, which they confide indispensable for the assessment of learners’ quality. I strongly agree with this statement owing to some inevitable affairs. This essay will assert this argument with some relevant evidence and examples.
First and foremost, learners cannot pay their entire ability of knowledge within the certain time limit of examinations for multifarious reasons. Moreover, this time constrain has some mental pressures, which has repercussions to the students mind. For instance, if pupils were not in perfect physical and mental condition in that certain time of examinations, they would not devote their attention in exam properly. Consequently, this process of evaluation annihilate the ability of learners’ creative mind.
In addition, the process of evaluation, which is curriculum based, has some crux for pupils. Since, this specific syllabus based evaluation process hinders to transcend their knowledge boundaries. To illustrate, one of my cousin was extraordinary meritorious, who could not obtain high marks only for the examination system. Hence, this examination process is detrimental for pupils, which cannot asses the their original quality.
In conclusion, some institution reject to the formal assessment in contemporary age as it cannot evaluate the students properly. Though formal evaluation has some appeal to the educators and guardians, it has some repercussions. Furthermore, it cannot asses the knowledge of any person within the time constrain. Within few curriculum people should not asses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iculum based, has some crux for pupils. Since, this specific syllabus based evaluatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...rimental for pupils, which cannot asses the their original quality. In conclusion, som...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08431904964 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4747498066 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117834559081 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410157680878 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531730169314 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771636230499 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037724642233 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.