Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do u agree or disagree?
It is true that aged people should be nominated in higher positions such as team leaders or members of board directors. However, there are some people suppose that the younger deserve to have the same opportunity to take over those responsibilities and I agree with both ideas for several reasons.
On one hand, the older people who have plenty of experiences in tackling management problems can complete challenging tasks of the leaders. They have worked for years to climb the ladder career so that, to some extents, they have proved their capabilities and should be rewarded. Besides, the senior will have closer and more relationships with other members than the junior. Therefore, they can administer internal affairs much more efficient by their interpersonal communication skills which require the younger a long time to achieve. Finally, in some working cultures, it is quite weird and ridiculous for some people to see the younger giving orders to the older as they argue that is disrespectful.
On the other hand, I also agree with the view that young employees should have a chance to be promoted. First, the creativity of these employees is high-valued to the development of organizations. For example, in a marketing company, the older the employees get the less innovative they become, so if that company wants to scale up, the younger should be in charge of the leaders. Second, the era of promoting people by their ages has gone, now every staff has an equal chance to nominate for higher positions if they are excellent enough.
In conclusion, both the younger and the older should be given the same opportunity to undertake the deserving positions
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity to undertake the deserving positions
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07608695652 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81611721579 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5108132016 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190708646867 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701256224826 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470036409331 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12550508926 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333032090232 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.