Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that high positions in a company are usually taken by elderly people. However, people are discussing that younger people might perform better than older people while they are in charge of the company. While I agree that the new generations could manage to run the organization more efficiently, letting old people to controlling the company also have some advantages.
On the one hand, allowing elder people to hold important roles in an organization have two main benefits. Firstly, older people tend to have more working experiences than young people because they have worked for quite a long time. Secondly, when facing a hard situation, elder people are usually more serene and confident than inexperienced people so they will be able to choose the correct solutions which are opposite in younger people.
On the other hand, young people could also bring some benefits to the company when they are given the permission to control it. First of all, young people will be able to operate modern technologies far better than elder people because they are born in the modern life and they have the ability to learn it faster. For example, it only took more than an hour for young people to fully control their smartphones but it took days for old people to use it properly. Furthermore, people who are young can devote themselves entirely to their works so they will be better at it when comparing it to older people who have to spend most of their time caring for their family.
In conclusion, it is true that geriatric person could bring benefits to their company, however, it is more reasonable to assign leadership roles to younger people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90425531915 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49612395063 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492907801418 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5709606863 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.727272727 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9090909091 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288893524877 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129112274833 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538166761576 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194301362657 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724079625246 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.