Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree?
It is obvious that leading positions in organizations are often held by older people. But, there is an opinion that younger people could be leaders and directors. In my opinion, older leaders are necessary for some specific fields, and younger people should also be given the chance to be at the top positions.
On one hand, older people should be leaders. Elderly ones usually have more experience in leading the whole organization and handling tasks as they are capable of dealing with work for a long amount of time. Specifically for some occupations like politicians, doctors or researchers, old people would be perfect for leading because they would make wiser decisions. In terms of having seniority, they usually receive trust and respect from the organization's workers and make it easier to be leaders.
On the other hand, younger people should also be at the top positions. Nowadays, people are often influenced and motivated by young leaders. Because of the rapid development of media and communication, brands usually hire younger people to be their key opinion leaders (KOL), this is now one of the most popular ways to advertise products. There are 2 major reasons for this. Firstly, young leaders can easily get access to modern technologies. And secondly, they bring up bright, youthful and delighted vibes. Another reason for younger ones to be leaders is that they have better physical conditions. They are at a young age, so they can work under pressure and finish it better than older ones.
In conclusion, I think both older and younger people can be leaders and directors. Depending on some fields' requirements, elderly people's seniority might be needed or young ones might be more suitable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70217419591 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7413758183 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3529411765 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390038260547 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146529811113 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111941433811 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287810164107 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986061705644 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.