Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We have all heard from different people that we only have to focus on the present regardless from what happened in the past, because you can not change what has already gone. Therefore all you need to do is to concentrate on what is happening now. This essay will try to show the importance of the past in our present life.
The past can never be erased or changed. For instance, whatever mistake you have done in the past will live with you for your whole life. Which is not bad because you learn from your past mistakes. For example, when your father tells you to do or not to do so, it is because he already lived and experienced his whole life, and now it is time to teach you how to avoid doing the same mistakes he has done. Although your father is talking about the past, his speech has a great value.
At the same time, the development in the different fields of technology is based on the past innovations. If we search for the first cellphone, camera, car, we can pretty much see how big is the difference between them. For example, try to remember the first cellphone you had and compare it with the device you are holding now. If the old phone did not exist you would not have this developed device now.
As a conclusion, the past is very important whether concerning experience and mistakes, or concerning different fields of technology. So in my opinion we should focus on the past to keep this development in precess.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...u can not change what has already gone. Therefore all you need to do is to concentrate on...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43939393939 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42006031313 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4459551674 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7142857143 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256410398135 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909282890123 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535830428193 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143237988094 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761055711831 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 12.4159519038 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.