In contemporary epoch, it is argued by some people that providing books are the major aim of the marvellous library that whether not only resources but also area ought to be yielding exorbitant hi-tech media like computer software, videos and DVDs the name but a few or not. I agree as much as disagree with the given statement, and would discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs with conclusion at last.
To embark, computers, which are being used, are extremely hazardous for mankind. For instance, nowadays, due to technological advancement, people have been using the computer by which people can read any fascinating books in lieu of physical books. Therefore, people have been setting in front of monitor screen of the computer by which rays are being impacted on the eyes directly so that people are suffering several drastic diseases regarding the eyes. Apart from that, people suffer from backbone pain owing to setting on the set continuously. Hence, if resource and space are not provided, people can live away from this kind of detrimental malady so that it is fruitful for humankind. Moreover, folks are disturbed by the pop up windows in computer or laptop. To illustrate, he or she is reading their charming book in the computer. During reading a book, pop up windows open on the screen of monitor concerning any tempting advertise. Hence, he or she is attracted toward advertisement. As a result, he or she cannot concentrate on the book which is being read. Thus, if people utilize physical book rather than video or DVDs, people cannot influenced by advertise. It is benefitial for reader.
However, individual is squandering their crucial time in order to seek the physical book in library. For example, if he or she wants to take a book, he or she has to go in the library and he or she cannot find a book rapidly. Also, he or she is wasting significant time in traffic consumption in order to go in library. Hence, if people use mobile or computer, any books, which he or she wants to take without paying money as well as time, can be obtained from internet so it is not only save time but also save money.
To sum up, I personally aver that although, any books are being provided by the library, resource along with space ought to be provided in the library, since it is easy to get any books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74752475248 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68098903132 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502475247525 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9274260993 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.947368421 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162210373303 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493047473465 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553254243898 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127797816899 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798658526019 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.