In contemporary epoch, it is argued by some people that whether aiding ought to be done by charity organisation to their own nation instead of other nation's people who have been living anywhere in entire the globe or not. I would discuss the both views before giving my own opinion in the forthcoming paragraphs with conclusion at last.
To embark, on the one side, literacy rate will shirnk if organisation would help their own country. For instance, nowadays, due to dearthing of money, indigent people might be afford the education for living tremendious life style. If philantropy will assist their host nation, overall literacy persentage would decline. Consequently, it is beneficial for not maraly for mankind but also for nation. Apart from that inspite of developing state, patronage will help to other developed nation; own country might be developed. That is why assesting ought to be done their own state rather then other nation.
However, on the other side, not maraly relantionship between tow nation will be enrich but also overall income would increase. To illustrate, IDG, which one of the biggest charitable trust, has contributed abundounce money in the Japan in order to erect other charity trust whic is being used for helping other nation's people. Owing to that, relationship will be better. Besides, Manifold marvellous business is built for reducing unemployment. As a result, overall income will enhance by leaps and bounds.
To recapitulate, I personally aver that although whether folks have been living at their native countr or not, charity organisation ought to be helped to people who are afflicting from drastic problem of their life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ought to be done their own state rather then other nation. However, on the other...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, so, then, apart from, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23048327138 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72582740053 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598513011152 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6833183532 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187357307957 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635911022846 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059027414063 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135758703987 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684483772551 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.