The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people argue that public libraries should not keep multimedia material but only printed books because the former occupies precious space and represent a waste public funds. I strongly disagree with this view because education has changed and multimedia material is needed more and more. This essay will outline some of the advantages that such new resources bring about.
Education has seen a dramatic change over the last 20 years. The majority of teachers these days use power point presentations, and multimedia courses are sometimes more appealing to students than classical printed books. In addition, certain types of software, such as drawing or calculation software, have become essential in certain disciplines, revolutionising and enriching the way in which people learn.
Another point in favour of keeping multimedia material in libraries is that they help save space and may run cheaper than traditional printed resources. For example, one DVD occupies the space of book, but it can store hundreds books, which would occupy much more space if they were printed out. This will help library and people save physical space, and maybe physical strains as electronic books have no weight except for the device necessary to use them. Lastly, electronic books can also help save money as one of these usually costs one third of the printed version.
In conclusion, modern libraries contain many multimedia resources and not only printed books. These multimedia resources make learning more interesting, are necessary for certain fields to develop, and help save physical space and sometimes money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fund'?
Suggestion: fund
...ious space and represent a waste public funds. I strongly disagree with this view bec...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... more and more. This essay will outline some of the advantages that such new resources brin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, so, third, except for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45634920635 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60869768331 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.11787274 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14425119153 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568960839724 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350130609778 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924894127196 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381337911872 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.