Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced.
To what extent to you agree or disagree?
It is believed that people and firms ought to pay different amounts of tax to clean and protect the environment in relation to the pollution they cause. I totally agree with this view because this would be an effective way to tackle the problem of refuse. In this essay, there will be illustrated the different outcomes which may derive from such a policy.
Pollution is becoming and ever pressing issue in our society, with a great deal of pollution due to pointless packaging. A recent report has brought to light that 80% of the packaging we find is superfluous and should not be found in our products. Most of it is not recycled but goes to landfill, seas or urban areas, polluting the environment and costing taxpayers money.
A further tax on those who pollute the most is likely to help shrink waste production. This is because people will be looking to producing less refuse and save money. More people will probably avoid buying products with too much packaging and probably recycle more of their refuse. Besides, taxing companies on what how much refuse they produce would have a huge impact because of the high amount firms produce. Pointless refuse amounts to billion of tonnes a year, and since it is not necessary, people would try not to produce it if this costs them money
In conclusion, a huge amount of refuse is produced for no reason, jeopardising the environment. Thus, taxing people and companies on the basis of how much refuse they produce can be a good deterrent to help clean and protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 441, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ms produce. Pointless refuse amounts to billion of tonnes a year, and since it is not n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, may, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82706766917 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56357074468 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2751606767 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195729224051 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733011730448 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075104825874 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115151919028 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260737409419 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.