Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of computers and the advent of e-books, it is felt that the money allocated for the maintenance of public libraries is spent in vain. I completely agree with this statement for two main reasons.
To sustain libraries, huge sums of money are spent on the library staff, renting as well as updating the database and it is not justified because of the digitalization of books. If one needs a book on psychology, for example, they no longer pay a visit to a library because they can search for an e-version of this book on the Internet. In addition to being effortless to use, e-books provide a reader with portability which paper-based ones are unable to offer. For instance, they do not require much space to be carried around and this particularly appeals to people since they can store dozens of books, say, on their laptops.
I do understand that public libraries are more readily attended by older people since they are less computer literate and are accustomed to acquiring information through tactile experience. However, with a growing concern about the environment, many people nowadays are reluctant to read books due to the materials used to produce those them. To provide public libraries, the environment has to suffer immensely because of logging. Therefore, would causing damage to the environment to provide libraries with resources and maintain their staff be the right courses of action?
In conclusion, not only supporting public libraries financially is inefficient for recent digitalization habits, but also environmental reasons. Therefore, I believe that the money channeled to sustain public libraries is wasted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ly because of logging. Therefore, would causing damage to the environment to provide li...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23220973783 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93795815878 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1517438075 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183441077194 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717393147825 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523408847905 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120654234076 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278316984485 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.