Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argued that computer technology are more and more developing so investing budget in maintain public libraries is not necessary. While I agree that computer plays an essential role in human’s life, I am more convinced that public libraries should be maintained.
I accept that there are several reasons why computer technology is highly benefits for human. Firstly, people could easy to access information by computer or laptop. With a computer connected to the internet, readers could find any free books or information in few minutes. They would not waste time to find out a book which they need on selves. Another reason is that people who keen on reading books also save their budget by reading books on the internet by their computer. Instead of an enormous amount of money devoted to buying books, they could invest in other demands such as clothes or domestic shopping.
However, I am firmly of the opinion that public libraries should be maintained for some reasons below. One of the most significant reasons is that it is the place which people could relieve stress after a long week study or work hard. This is because the atmosphere at almost all libraries also quite so readers could enjoy their books without bothering about engine or traffic noise. By this way, they also practice concentrating ability which is extremely important with people work white – collar jobs.
In conclusion, while I believed that computer technology brings about positive impacts on readers, I am more convinced that public libraries should be maintained.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11284046693 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59097809656 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575875486381 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3893686454 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157786208117 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589072632141 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052364718164 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107592293684 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520723619716 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.