Many animals are being hunted to the brink of extinction in order to fulfil the demand and greed of mankind for decorative purposes as well as for other reasons, such as traditional medicine.
How can this issue be tackled?
In modern society, how people protect animals is always controversial and there is much wildlife which is killed and in the verge of extinction since people use them to produce luxury products and traditional medicine. In this essay, I shall suggest some solutions.
To begin with, I believe that there are several ways to decrease the number of animal hunting. In my opinion, the most effective method to this is that the government should strictly limit or prohibit these acts by setting up the low to protect wildlife. In South Africa where there was a serious animal hunting issue, for example, in 2010, the government announced the constitution to prevent animals from hunters. As a result of this, they managed to decline the number of animals which were killed by hunters by 70 per cent when compared to the last couple of decades.
Another way to conserve animals from being hunted is that authorities should publicize the video of how animals are brutally killed by hunters. In fact, in 2015, the authority broadcasted the documentary about how luxury products made of alligator’s skin were being manufactured. Although this caused controversy, this incident strongly discouraged people to buy animal products and the percentage of sales of the animal product was sharply decreased at that year. Therefore, in my opinion, if the government seriously address these issues, we all human beings can make significant progress in this problem.
In conclusion, I discussed how people should address this problem. In order to protect animals from being in the danger of extinction caused by animal products, the government should take responsibility to solve this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssay, I shall suggest some solutions. To begin with, I believe that there are ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e significant progress in this problem. In conclusion, I discussed how people sh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21771217712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82412002689 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3251641479 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226510520812 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827700130872 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456200369378 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140514466721 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351480056565 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.