In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.
Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?
Digital security using cameras has become popular recently in many places for security purposes. I believe that its advantages are more than its disadvantages.
It is obvious that, most of the shops and firms are being monitored by video recording system. This system helps the owners to continually watch their properties, even they are at far distance. Robbers and shoplifters are afraid of being captured on the screens, so they prefer to stay away from places that are under video-surveillance. This helps the owners to protect their facilities. In crowded places, also, robberies could be committed easily without being noticed from the ordinary guards, but video cameras have the ability to capture these crimes in detail. As a result of this , police officers find it easy to arrest the offenders without huge efforts. Many innocent people could be saved from jail, if there was a recording camera at the crime scene. For example, I saw a movie that was based on a true story talking about a murder crime and an innocent lady went to the jail because the criminal touched her coat with his bloody hands, and she only moved the crime weapon away from her road to the car. Unfortunately there was no camera.
Lack of freedom is the main reason that makes people disagree about recording cameras. They believe that they are under control and each move they make, will be counted against them. Another drawback is that the wide usage of the programmed-cameras will replace guards and policemen. As a result of this, people will not feel safe. Moreover, hackers could find a way to switch off the whole camera system and commit crimes easily.
In conclusion, I support the use of video cameras because their pros are more than the cons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se crimes in detail. As a result of this , police officers find it easy to arrest ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88851351351 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57472526132 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60472972973 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9939788762 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207949713883 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633405046946 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500677021853 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126048518554 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254258839816 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.