Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside?
Due to the growth in population that a number of countries are experiencing, there is need of building new houses. From my point of view, new houses should be built not too far from existing cities. In this essay, I will explain why and how this process should take place.
Living quite close or inside a city has many advantages. Firstly, cities offer more services to their inhabitants such as cinemas, libraries and job opportunities than small towns or villages in the countryside. Secondly, cities usually have efficient transport systems. Therefore, who live close to the city centre may use public transport and be environmentally friendly, whereas the ones who live in the countryside may need to use their own cars to be involved in the activities of a city, a thing now almost mandatory in our society. Lastly, by building houses inside or close to a city rather than in the countryside, green areas of the countryside will not be spoiled, thereby they will keep serve the purpose of producing oxygen. However, people need to live in green and quiet areas.
Thus, new houses within a city should be surrounded by trees and be away from busy roads. Trees are fundamental to cool the air, absorb pollutants and relax people's brains. It has been reported that cities where there are few trees are more polluted than the ones with more trees, and this has lead to poor quality of life of their citizens. Very important is that new houses are to be built away from motorways because noise and pollution negatively affect the wellbeing of the people who live close by.
In conclusion, living in a city, or close to it, has many advantages for a person, and it is also useful to preserve the nature of country areas. However, people who live in a city should have enough green areas around their houses and be away from busy roads such as motorways in order not to have a poor quality of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70658682635 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5511371511 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3196669605 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309673779016 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101061953467 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682484557273 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192274139978 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577249487682 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.