In many countries children are engaged in some kinds of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility Discuss both views and give your own opinio

Essay topics:

In many countries children are engaged in some kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In this day and age, the range of ages for working has been further expanded. In various nations, businesses and corporations have started to recruit young children, which is causing conflicting opinions. Some people support this phenomenon by claiming it as an invaluable chance for youngsters’ development, whilst others argue that it could be detrimental to the juveniles. This essay will provide an analysis into both sides and present a personal perspective on the issue.

On the one hand, early working is supposed to have a damaging effect on children’s lives. This is to say, the young may suffer from physical and mental problems during the premature course of work. Regarding the physical problems, it is reported that some children are given labour-intensive tasks which may exceed their physical endurance. That, consequently, results in fatigue and in the long run would possibly leave the kids with horrendously permanent injuries. Additionally,as not being sufficiently equipped with skills and life experiences, teenage workers potentially run the risk of being bullied at work, which may leave them with a distorted impression on working.

On the other hand, participating in the work-labour is proven to benefit youngsters’ growth to some extent. First of all, it is the exposure to real-life working environments that facilitate the youth with necessary skills which are said as not being acquired elsewhere. For example, teenagers could enhance their communication and conflict-management skills via partaking in conversations and collaboration with others in a serious job setting, which seems more rewarding than a mere discussion or group work session at school. On a higher level, being a member of the workforce is an optimal approach in educating youngsters with the value of working. The more demanding the job, the more rewarding the effort is, and thus children could gain a clearer perception of work.

In conclusion, there has been a heated controversy over the issue of children engaging in paid work prematurely. From my personal perspective, I would support the latter viewpoint, which condones the phenomena as it provides juveniles with chances to get exposed to the real-life working environment for perception and skills development. Risky as it may be, the rewards from early working seem to outweigh its negative sides.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...ndously permanent injuries. Additionally,as not being sufficiently equipped with sk...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42432432432 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13727908986 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5746614595 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.058823529 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205928530125 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698484392888 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440828419289 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131261111811 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019016526427 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.