In many countries the government likes to spend more money on the arts some people agree with this however other think government should spend more on health and education discuss both sides and give your opinion

Every country’s identity is preserved through its traditions, arts and cultures. While traditions and cultures have been inherited by the individuals, art is, certainly, the responsibility of the government to take care. Although some support policymaker’s investment in arts, others disagree that it should concentrate on upscaling the public services like education and healthcare. In this essay, I will discuss both views and explain why I agree that regime should fund on art.

Art has been a medium through which a country’s history and heritage have been passed on for centuries. First of all, many countries have been losing their identity as the government is not keen on funding its art galleries. In India, for example, many of the artifacts in the Indian Museum, which has been preserved since BC200, are badly damaged and are irreparable. They are unable to preserve these antiques as the government does not sponsor the gallery and hence, many of these historical monuments are getting lost and damaged. In addition to this, art provides employment opportunities for many people in a country. Music, for instance, is an art which creates job opportunities for almost 20 percent in a country. Any country would become vague and unremarkable if policymakers do not invest in promoting these fine skills.

Others, however, argue that it is health and education which require more significance than art as these benefit the current generations to survive. In South Africa, for instance, many people are infected due to the poor sanitation of the country. It was even reported that almost 4 out of 10 people in South Africa have been affected by Cholera and diarrhea. With this condition, if the lawmakers invest more on improving the hygiene than spending in arts, definitely it will help its citizens. Similarly, some countries like Pakistan, have higher illiteracy rate, and the regime should fund in upgrading schools and amenities.

In conclusion, although some countries lack in education and healthcare services, I personally feel that equal priority should be given in preserving the arts of the country, considering its cultural and historical values.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31213872832 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92258702499 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3588834506 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.117647059 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282756788578 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833328789941 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466727954756 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165828853977 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540834578641 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.