In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects.
What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
There is no denying that in many parts of the world, students have tendency to apply other subjects like mathematics, music or languages instead of choosing science as their major. This phenomenon results from many factors, causing an adverse bearing on both individuals and society.
A compelling reason why students tend not to go with science is that these subjects are too complex to be able to comprehend. There is not only a great deal of academic knowledge but also lots of assignments, examinations and practical experiments that require learners to make an enormous effort to deal with. Also, for the sake of these curriculums, students are always under intense pressure and sometimes feel overwhelming. Moreover, in comparison with other fields, undergraduates have to take longer time to accomplish their scientific lessons. For instance, scientific students normally takes from five to seven years to complete their courses while students in other disciplines only take about 4 years to get a diploma. At the extreme, graduates, who spent a lot of time catching up in scientific researches though, still have to face the risk of unemployment after achieving science diplomas.
A discernible effect is that the insufficience of scientific experts, who play an important role in carrying out research or inventing new applications for any aspects of human life, may decelerate the development of society. For example, the covid-19 epidemic will never rage out without scientific research into the vaccine. Imbalance in employment needs is another irrefutable impact. The number of job vacancies in other areas will become limited and more competitive since there are so many applicants while employees in scientific fields are increasingly scarce.
In conclusion, there are several factors result in the lack of science learners, and this trend can bring about severely negative influences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | Giang H Do | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Tynna | 89 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 89
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 90
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41750841751 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97503280841 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9089968002 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151997154742 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488314270973 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486923631675 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864520936898 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052623743881 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.