In many countries, people can eat a wide variety of food that are grown in other areas. As a result, they eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Exported foods are widely consumed all over the world, yet arguments about whether this development produces an unfavorable impact on life’s quality seem to not be ceased. In my opinion, I believe that this has both positive and negative effects.
It is clear that exported products may not be beneficial for health. International foods take time going through transporting, reviewing, and supervising. A product from another continent can take up to 3 months of transferring and checking, therefore, will not be fresh as when it was harvested. As a result, exported foods comprise a significant amount of preservatives. Preservatives is a chemical substance to prevent cuisine from rotting and affects people’s digestion system in the long run. As this hazard will not decompose easily, it has the ability to cause cancer and other health effects. Recent research announced that if a young adult consumed conservatives on a daily basis, their longevity would decrease by 10 years.
However, international consumptions provide variety and convenience. In a community where various races are living together, development and adaptation are inevitable. Foods are the main factor of life quality, and by accepting foods from other areas, this substantially increases comfort and convenience. Moreover, exported products are generally cheaper. For instance, basa fish exported from Vietnam is half the price of a salmon but contains a similar amount of nutrition. This wide range of choices enables individuals to pick the most suitable products for their health and finance.
To conclude, exported foods have a two-sided effect. With the proper use and consumption, these products will create a dual-benefit to health and convenience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, therefore, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58052434457 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13772748693 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9164452665 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6470588235 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192486043819 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056406859284 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646548572566 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113108772129 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340388917062 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.