Under the background that become global problems, the reutilization of recyclable resources such as paper, glass and some kinds of metal remains low level in dozens of countries and regions. The whole process involves lots of participants, including individuals, private companies, Department of the Environment and government and there are many measures to improve each step from garbage collection to reusing the new materials.
It’s not only residents’ but also society’s fault about insufficient resource recycling. To begin with, as for residents, most of them haven’t taken the problem of wasting materials seriously. The amount of good which they purchase exceeds their true needs, resulting severe waste. Besides, they don’t follow the rules of garbage classification strictly. On the side of factories, they lack the advanced technology to process the materials properly. Finally, not every government imply feasible policies to push the development in this field.
We should regard the recycling of waste materials as a whole and try different methods to cope with different problems respectively. First of all, we are supposed to strengthen the citizens awareness of environmental protection. For example, Japanese children start learning the rules of garbage collection since they are in the kindergarten and the communities will give out leaflet with explanation and illustration in details. The second point is that governments allocate more budget on building more refuse processing plant and upgrade processing equipments and machines.
After having discussed the most pertinent points about this issue, I’m convinced that human beings have the ability to solve the current problems and recycle waste materials better than before, while we can’t ignore the barriers on the way to achieve the goal, including the unawareness of people and backward processing technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, well, as for, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59523809524 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12801106729 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6011223186 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139420309327 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417736017573 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323463746353 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791085326705 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338030966903 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.