Many countries spend a huge amount of money on supporting their competitors to take part in some worldwide sports competitions. Others argue that it would be better if these countries can spend money on children to take part in sports. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion?
Many people believe there is no need for countries to spend large sum of money to support athletes join in international competitions. And the money could cause better result if be used in encouraging kids to exercise. While some other people disagree. This essay will discuss both view.
No one would deny the importance of winning in international competitions for a country. Trophy is not only the honor for athletes but also show how powerful a country is. That is the main reason for why many countries are willing to invest athletes to attain famous competitions such Olympic Games or world football match. Moreover, the victory in sports game can raise a strong self-confidence in domestic. For instance, Chinese athletes seldom lose in table tennis match around the world, and therefore Chinese people have a strong confidence in this sport. Finally, when watching sports competition which domestic athletes attained, audiences will have more possibility to exercise later. This can also help citizens to stay healthy.
However, people who advocate that government should put money to encourage children to doing sport is also reasonable. First and foremost, children are the hope for a country. So to make next generation have strong and healthy body is a significant goal in education process. Instead of wasting money in few athletes, to increase sports facilities and attract kids to playing sports will bring more benefits, since children may be more healthy and energetic by exercise. Moreover, sports game such as basketball and soccer can cultivate a sense of cooperation within teenagers. It can help them finish team work better in future study or career.
In conclusion, I believe both are important toward countries. But since teenagers are hope for countries, give them a better base of life will be more necessary for countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e used in encouraging kids to exercise. While some other people disagree. This essay ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24080267559 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77967268569 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2770836335 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4736842105 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200071914825 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591169150758 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463711977843 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129402856381 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839316146503 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.