Some people think 'vertical city' is the best, where people live and work in tall buildings, others think 'horizontal city' is better, where there are fewer tall buildings. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
For individual, settle down in one’s favorite city is the best. However, the construction style of different cities satisfy different tastes of people. And it has led to an endless debate as to whether or not living in a city with tall buildings or staying in the counterpart with small houses. I believe that compared to living in small buildings, to live and work in large skyscrapers enjoys more.
On the one hand, living in vertical city is benefit for people’s health, which means residents or workers could, to some extent, stay away from city noise or air contamination since they are living in a high building. The car horns and pedestrian noise cannot reach high-rise buildings, therefore people can enjoy in tranquility and have better life quality. Another merit is that, people might have a merry mood since the employees can feast their eyes on the city view from those tall building when they need to have a relaxation. To the final point, since the city development issue has been more and more concerned, building more skyscrapers can reduce the pressure of housing shortage and also meeting the requirement of population explosion. Since human also need enough soil to farm, and in this aspect, those small buildings always occupy the precious and limited land resources.
On the other hand, some people might argue that horizontal city is better. Since tall buildings is not suitable for all cities, especially for those underdeveloped towns. And build high buildings may leave pressure to financial budget of the local government. But I still have to concede that living in houses has less merits than living in tall buildings.
To summarize, I believe that developing vertical city is a better choice for city development in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
...le. And it has led to an endless debate as to whether or not living in a city with tall buildings or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun merits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ve to concede that living in houses has less merits than living in tall buildings. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68465619213 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3470146463 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22024437318 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845133645229 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602105102052 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145806848796 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217313775313 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.